InSouthern Cross Exploration v Fire & All Risks Insurance (1985) 1 NSWLR 114, this clarification, perWaddell J;
Buckley v Bennell Design and Constructions Pty Ltd was an application to the Court of Appeal for an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal from a refusal of an application for security for costs in respect of an arbitration.
It’s easier if you read right-to-left, but purists would of course just re-introduce the brackets that are patently missing from this rendering.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 28th, 2006 at 2:45 pmand is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
InSouthern Cross Exploration v Fire & All Risks Insurance (1985) 1 NSWLR 114, this clarification, perWaddell J;
Buckley v Bennell Design and Constructions Pty Ltd was an application to the Court of Appeal for an extension of time within which to apply for leave to appeal from a refusal of an application for security for costs in respect of an arbitration.
It’s easier if you read right-to-left, but purists would of course just re-introduce the brackets that are patently missing from this rendering.
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 28th, 2006 at 2:45 pmand is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.